US federal agencies must appoint chief AI officers, according to new guidelines

midian182

Posts: 9,745   +121
Staff member
What just happened? Vice President Kamala Harris has announced a new set of requirements for all US agencies designed to ensure the use of AI remains safe and non-discriminatory. These include the appointment of a chief AI officer to oversee each agency's use of the technology. Additionally, travelers will be allowed to refuse facial recognition scans at airport security screenings without fear of consequences.

The requirements, which will come into effect on December 1, state that in addition to appointing an AI overseer, agencies will have to establish AI governance boards. Each agency is also required to publish a report online and to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) showing a complete list of the AI systems they use, their reasons for using them, the associated risks, and how they intend to mitigate them.

A senior Biden administration official said that in some agencies, the chief AI officer will be a political appointee, whereas in others, it will not.

Agencies have already started hired for this position; the Department of Justice announced Jonathan Mayer as its first CAIO in February. OMB chair Shalanda Young said the government plans to hire 100 AI professionals by the summer.

"We have directed all federal agencies to designate a chief AI officer with the experience, expertise, and authority to oversee all AI technologies used by that agency, and this is to make sure that AI is used responsibly, understanding that we must have senior leaders across our government, who are specifically tasked with overseeing AI adoption and use," Harris told reporters.

The new requirements build on the Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence announced by President Biden last October. It mandated, among other things, that clear guidance be provided to landlords, federal benefits programs, and federal contractors to address the ways AI is often used to deepen discrimination, bias, and facilitate abuses in justice, healthcare, and housing.

Harris gave an example of how the new requirements would work in practice: if the Veterans Administration wants to use AI in VA hospitals to help doctors diagnose patients, it would need to show the AI system does not produce "racially biased diagnoses."

Other examples include travelers having the ability to opt out of the use of TSA facial recognition without being delayed or losing their place in line. Furthermore, human oversight will be required when AI is used for critical diagnosis decisions in federal healthcare systems, and when the technology is used to detect fraud in government services.

"If an agency cannot apply these safeguards, the agency must cease using the AI system, unless agency leadership justifies why doing so would increase risks to safety or rights overall or would create an unacceptable impediment to critical agency operations," the OMB fact sheet reads.

The guidance adds that any government-owned AI models, code, and data should be released to the public unless they pose a risk to government operations.

Permalink to story.

 
A senior Biden administration official said that in some agencies, the chief AI officer will be a political appointee, whereas in others, it will not.

This is a MAJOR mistake. The AI Officer must be technically savvy and given broad ranging powers to nip any violators in the bud, otherwise the position is a toothless tiger, useless to the taxpayers .....
 
A senior Biden administration official said that in some agencies, the chief AI officer will be a political appointee, whereas in others, it will not.

This is a MAJOR mistake. The AI Officer must be technically savvy and given broad ranging powers to nip any violators in the bud, otherwise the position is a toothless tiger, useless to the taxpayers .....


Please… not another Mayorkas. Please…
 
More unrestricted government growth. How much will our taxes increase to pay the salaries and benefits for these additional unelected bureaucrats? Not to mention the army of support personnel who will have to be hired to do any real work, of which there will be none. Government produces nothing and only takes.
 
A senior Biden administration official said that in some agencies, the chief AI officer will be a political appointee, whereas in others, it will not.

This is a MAJOR mistake. The AI Officer must be technically savvy and given broad ranging powers to nip any violators in the bud, otherwise the position is a toothless tiger, useless to the taxpayers .....

"Ideal candidates, the White House recommended, might include chief information officers, chief data officers, or chief technology officers, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) policy said."
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...l-agency-must-now-appoint-a-chief-ai-officer/
 
Sounds better than letting any government employee try to turn their job over to the nearest available AI chatbot while still getting paid. Not that that won't still happen.

it would need to show the AI system does not produce "racially biased diagnoses."
The standard should be that it does not make things worse (in any major category, or simply put, in being wrong more often.) Human systems make plenty of mistakes now, AI will too, the goal should be to improve workflows using all available tools to move in a positive direction.
 
I'm confident they will hire private sector insiders to ensure all official AI spending finds its way to the right pockets. Guys, don't forget to ask Mr. Altman for his short list of candidates.
 
Back